beweisen vs. erweisen
Kyle Goetz last edited by Kyle Goetz
I keep getting
Letztendlich hat sich diese Entscheidung als richtig erwiesenwrong because every time I guess
What is the difference between
erweisen? The dictionary lists both as "to prove," so I would assume that either in past participal form would be acceptable.
Helfen Sie mir Obi-Wan Kenobi, Sie sind meine einzige Hoffnung!
@Jonathan is on the right track, but the difference isn't about active or passive. "sich erweisen" is a reflexive verb, meaning the direct object and the subject are necessarily the same. So, the correct translation probably wouldn't be just "prove", but rather "prove itself": "The decision proved (itself) to be for the best", or "the decision turned out to be for the best".
"Beweisen" on the other hand probably always acts on something other than the subject (maybe unless if we're talking artificial intelligence ).
As a side note, there's also the non-reflexive verb "erweisen", that has a different meaning: "Ich erweise ihm einen Gefallen", "I do him a favor". "Ich erweise ihm eine Ehre", "I bestow an honor upon him", and so forth.
In my understanding is “erweisen” more passive than “beweisen”. When you actively prove something, then “beweist du es”. When something eventually turns out to be right, it is “erwiesen”. I hope that helps you.